Judge Grants Divorce to Woman Because Her Husband Left Her Messages On Read
According to one Taiwanese court, "A normal couple shouldn't treat each other like that."
Leaving
someone on read is probably the most heinous thing you can do, so it's
gratifying to see a Taiwanese court recognize it for the abomination it is.
The BBC reports that
a judge in Hsinchu, northern Taiwan, has granted a woman a divorce after she
submitted evidence that her husband had been reading her text messages and
ignoring them.
The wife, who
has only been named by her surname Lin, had been using the text messaging
service Line to contact her husband. Similar to WhatsApp or iMessage, Line has
a "read" function that allows users to see when a recipient has
opened their messages.
While
ignoring someone's messages may sound trivial, on one occasion Lin messaged her
husband to tell him she'd been admitted to hospital following a car crash. He
failed to respond even after she texted him to ask why he was ignoring her,
although he did visit her in the hospital once.
Lin told the
court that her husband didn't reply to her texts for six months. His silence
only ended when, two months after her car accident, he texted to ask a
practical question about their dog and to let her know that he had her mail.
"He
didn't show any concern for her," said Judge Kao, granting Lin her request
for a divorce on the grounds that the marriage was beyond repair. "There's
very little interaction with the plaintiff; the defendant rarely replies to the
plaintiff's messages."
The couple,
who had been married since 2012, had a variety of other problems. Lin had to
pay most household expenses as her husband didn't have a stable income. She
also alleged that his relatives had treated her badly since she moved into the
family home, even down to controlling how long she could use the bathroom and
the temperature of the shower water.
But Judge Kao
made it clear in her comments that the Lin's husband's pattern of repeatedly
ignoring very serious text messages was a major motivator for her decision to
grant a divorce. "A normal couple shouldn't treat each other like
that," she explained. "The Line messages were a very important piece
of evidence. It shows the overall state of the marriage… that the two parties
don't have good communication."
Ignoring
multiple messages is a common source of irritation for many people in
relationships, romantic or otherwise. But when does it cross into neglect?
"Intimate
and loving relationships should create a priority level response when it comes
to texts and phone calls," explains relationship therapist Emma Kenny.
"By ignoring her and by moreover purposely ignoring her texts he is acting
in an unreasonable and emotionally negligent manner and this would fit the
divorce criteria required."
While at
least Lin is rid of her ex, one further irony stands out in this case: Her
husband never bothered to show up for the divorce court hearing, or respond to
any of the court's notices.
No comments